In the speech, the President delivered a scathing attack on some of Britain's most decorated figures such as Winston Churchill, calling them racists who had ravaged Africa and blighted its post-colonial development. His deplorable remarks were made worse by the fact that he made them in a speech in Sudan, a country whose government is one of the world's most notorious abusers of human rights.
South African opposition leader Tony Leon is quoted as saying Mbeki was guilty of "gross and deliberate mischaracterisation" of Sudanese history and an "own goal" against South Africa's image abroad. He said:
"Certainly, the British have much to answer for in Sudan — but so too do African countries such as Egypt, which was the first colonial power in the region in the early 19th century and whose rule included slave trading.Read full story.
The late nineteenth century Mahdist regime, which Mbeki singled out for praise, had enslaved black people and also attacked Ethiopia and tried to attack Egypt. In the decades since independence, the slave trade had returned to Sudan, and the government had engaged in a series of brutal wars that pitted the Arab and Muslim north against the African Christian and animist south.
So while President Mbeki tries to portray himself, his government and Africa as a whole as the helpless, angry and self-pitying victims of colonial forces and racists past and present, the truth is rather more complicated.
And whatever argument the president wishes to make about history, it is no mark of courage to stand in Sudan today and rail against British colonial authorities (including Winston Churchill) long after they are gone and without saying a word to the country's present rulers about their present behaviour.
President Mbeki's remarks are a clear indication that human rights and democracy are at the bottom of his agenda. The politics and psychology of solidarity reign supreme."
South African President Thabo Mbeki recently welcomed by his Sudanese counterpart Omer El Bashir
Here are some comments from a Jan 5 report on President Mbeki's speech blaming British imperialism for Sudans problems. (3) and (9) are pretty funny.
(1) i am a zim living abroad and would like to tell u guys not to bother about mbeki. he is a nutter who supports the old school of thinking like his friend robert of zimbabwe. politically messed upstairs and not worth his position. black africans just want dignity and freedom of expression and development and mbeki shouldnt talk for us. average black south africans are desperately poor.neigbours to the north are even worse of because of the mugabes and mbekis. shame there can be only one mandela. - UK
(2) mbeki is oke. he is trying to badmouth the current british for past wrongs. if that is his logic, then he should commit harikari since he must then blame himself for all past wrongs in south african politics. - USA
(3) after reading this article i now have a better understanding of the current situation in sudan, its all churchills" fault. i have just heard from idi amin that king arthur and sir lancelot also had a hand in the current civil war in darfur. apparently the knights of the round table want to take over the region so they can dominate the fish & chip industry. rumour has it elton john wants to open anjaweed dating service in khartoum. henry viii has been seen in the area...peace. - CANADA
(4) i think mbeki was very clever to mention the british in this way. note how much more attention an article about sudan has been given. there are never this many comments. the world needs to give more attention to sudan. looks like it worked. - USA
(5) when are these africans going to get their act right . what's the use of going on blaming the british and other colonial powers who have left africa more than 50 years back. stop whing and get down to solving your problems ..... - INDIA
(6) mbeki is controversial president with big mouth, he even said do not cause british did not kll millions in sudan, bashir did it and mbeki has the gut to stand side by side with and make this comment, shyme on him. - USA
(7) it is typical for african leaders to blame everyone else, for their incapacities. brittish involvement in sudan, was shorter than sudan was independent from brittain. this article though, did skew mbekis statements a bit.when i read the transcript, it sounded to me as an appeal to britain, to accept a measure of blame , and participate in sorting this mess out. mbeki has never been emphatic, and his vaguery makes him easy to misquote. the anc and mandela, do not tolerate any violence. - S AFRICA
(8) in light of mbeki's comments, i think it would be only fair for the british to take over again and fix all the problems. - CANADA
(9) i blame the vikings, they are the ones thats started it........er a long time ago. when are they going to say sorry for all the blood shed the caused. - UK
(10) i do think mbeki is wrong, but in south africa we still get evrything that goes wrong still blamed on apartheid even though we just celebrated a decade of democracy. i do think to blame something so ancient shows how little the current government has done to rectify this, and sadly this goes for south africa as well. and i do not think mbeki and mandela is hurting south africans, other than their statements, as it is theirs and can not assume to speak for all south africans. - S AFRICA
- - -
QUOTATIONS OF THE DAY
"The tragedy of the tsunami was through the force of nature," British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Thursday. "The tragedy of Africa is through the failure of man."[via CBC News report Jan 7 - "Don't forget Africa in tsumani's wake, Blair urges"]
"There is the equivalent of a man-made, preventable tsunami every week in Africa."
- - -
Here is a little gem from a report at the Guardian:
After the Boxing Day earthquake, many asked how a God could allow a tsunami to cause such suffering. That is the wrong question. Instead, we should be asking a question we can actually answer: how can human beings allow a mosquito to cause millions of deaths?- - -
And, this snippet from a piece titled The Logic of Military Intervention - in which the author concludes we remain essentially uncivilised which is the reason why history records a never-ending series of the worst forms of conquest and repression, including the extremes of slavery, human sacrifice and genocide:
The only way our species can end war for all time is to transcend it, by changing our behavior such that we leave it behind. To do this we must learn, and then actively and continuously work, to cooperate and not compete, including in every aspect of life. It really is that simple. (Even a child can understand it.) Anytime we are in a situation involving other people, we should ask ourselves how we can help them and work together with them, not how we can position ourselves to get an advantage over them and defeat them.
No comments:
Post a Comment